Practical Prepping Blog

Preparations for a very uncertain future. . .

‘Conservative Enemies of the State’

I was recently perusing my favorite internet sites when I came across a link to the above titled article on the FrontPageMag website.  From openly courting Muslim recruits, to chaplains getting the OK to perform Gay marriages, to women soon being allowed in ALL combat roles, to calling the Fort Hood massacre by an islamist terrorist ‘work place violence’, the US military has certainly undergone a ‘Fundamental Transformation’ (hey, where have I heard that phrase before………) in that past 5 years.  And that transformation is continuing unabated.

This short article has more information on a theme I have proffered often here on this blog – that being that YOU, not some bogey-man AL-Qaeda terrorist, is in the cross-hairs of the DHS and the rest of the Fed alphabet soup.  YOU, the conservative, gun-loving, liberty-loving, limited government wanting, God-loving, Gadsden Flag waving, preppers are now classified as being members of ‘Neo-Confederate’ hate groups and must be closely scrutinized.

Don’t believe me?  Read the article.

Lee Greenwood was unavailable for comment.

Be safe.  Be prepared.

Practical Prepper 2013

Advertisements

September 2, 2013 - Posted by | General, My Opinion, Security and Situational Awareness | , ,

4 Comments »

  1. Personally I agree with women in combat.
    The West have always had a hang up about women in combat despite distant and recent history showing the highest sniper kills are often that of women.
    In WW2 the Russians let them fly combat. Something which they did VERY effectively.

    They fly combat and transport today.
    We’ve all seen them driving logistics round.
    Loads of lives have been saved by female combat medics.
    OK hefting munitions round and hand to hand may be a disadvantage BUT IMO they have uses in a combat role.

    Comment by thoughtfullyprepping | September 2, 2013 | Reply

    • Flying transport planes and driving logistics trucks is most decidedly NOT akin to dragging a wounded 195 lb man + 80-100 lb loadout out of harm’s way. Women are fine for the first role – inadequate and deficient in the second and only force men into harm’s way to do what they simply cannot. The military is not an Affirmative Action vehicle, nor should it ever be.

      Comment by practicalprepper | September 2, 2013 | Reply

  2. Clearly you have some sort of issue with us “conservative” Muslims too, considering the message you sent to my email as your blog. I guess it never occurred to you that some of your subscribers aren’t a part of your faith tradition, but may believe in self-sufficiency and food storage and agriculture and “The American way” and are RURAL Americans but also MUSLIMS. So since I am your apparent boogie-woman… and my husband Eric a boogie-man in your views because we are Muslim… I think I will learn self-sufficiency ELSEWHERE. Mind you, both of us are from multi-generational AMERICAN families. Both of us can trace our roots back to the Massachusetts Bay Colonies. Who FIgured? Muslim Americans with BLUE BLOODED AMERICAN ROOTS. I guess you didnt. HAVE a great life and may the Creator of the Universe protect you for your own bigotry.

    Comment by Anisah | September 12, 2013 | Reply

    • You can take offense if you wish, but I was referring to the US military’s shrinking tolerance of traditional American values, and open-armed acceptance of fringe, politically correct notions like Gay marriage, and referring to Major Hassan’s Fort Hood jihad as ‘Workplace Violence’. If you distance yourselves from the Islamic extremists and their calls for Shariah Law, insistence that I either convert to Islam, pay the jizya, or die, or their world-wide ‘murder for Allah’ Jihad, then we have no problem. If you don’t or won’t, then your absence from this site will be a welcomed one. The boogey-man comment was directed against our government, not Muslims. It referred to how,, whenever the gov wants a war or wishes to confiscate a little more of our freedoms, they trot out ‘al-qaeda’, to scare the sheep. It wasn’t an anti-Muslim comment at all, as an objective reading would have revealed – not one by a person bent on being offended such as yourself.

      Comment by practicalprepper | September 12, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Don's Racing Blog

Follow me as I participate in 4 different types of auto racing in 2014

DumpDC

It's Secession Or Slavery. Choose One. There Is No Third Choice.

%d bloggers like this: